Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Harry Neutel's avatar

Could someone explain why CAF wants LAV 10x10 with RCH, or at least link an article that explains their current wants? Noah mentioned them wanting the protection level of the LAV platform; is that greater or less than the K9? I don't actually know a ton about mobile artillery, but I assume they reduce the armour to compensate for the weight of the gun, and the fact they are supposed to be behind the front line, not on it. I thought that we were looking at tracked IFV to increase their usability in the artic, as a apposed to the wheeled LAVs, so I'm surprised that they would prefer a wheeled artillery platform over a tracked one.

Kevin's avatar
1hEdited

If K-9 was to be built here for export, I could see our military opting for a split fleet of tracked K-9 and K-10 with the possibility of also procuring some hybrid LAV chassis/K9 gun systems/loaders wouldn't be difficult to ship LAV chassis to the K-9 factory for modifications especially if it's set up in Ontario. Just a thought.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?