Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Harry Neutel's avatar

Thanks for the note on this one. It provided important context for us. While I was aware from previous posts that L3 MAS had sustainment for the f35 in Mirabel, and I remember reading somewhere some saucy comments about how we needed to buy all 88 to reap the benefits, I didn't realize how much they had riding on the additional USAF and USN sustainment.

I guess the real question is, if they loose out on the extra work from the US because we don't take the whole order, will their losses affect their ability to continue sustainment activities for the RCAF going forward? I'm not going to cry very big tears if Lockheed takes a little something on the chin, if it means that Canada's defence industry prospers, but I don't want to unintentionally hamstring the RCAF while doing so.

Another good question is, how many of those 3500 jobs they are making noise about loosing are current employees, rather than potential ones? I don't want to kill existing jobs, but I have no problem loosing potential jobs in one place if it means making a greater number somewhere else. If we started making Gripens in Quebec, I'm pretty sure most of those same people would end up working a the Gripen factory in one form or another.

Maybe I'm being unfair. Maybe loosing out on the US sustainment contracts will hurt Canada more than I think they will, and we Gripen factories are also still hypothetical, and potentially only a limited long term benefit to Canada, if the supply chain for building Gripens don't actually translate into a useful base for building future gen 6 fighters, but I don't think so.

No posts

Ready for more?