Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael baranowski's avatar

For those who want Canada to buy/build the Gripen one might view this as another piece of the puzzle leading to the potential acquisition of the Gripen. I might be reading too much into it. I still think it’s all tied into Trump and CUSMA. Unless things go right off the rails with the U.S. the f35 is reaching the point where cancelling the order is practically speaking not even an option. What that leaves us with is convincing the Americans to get on board with a supplementary Gripen acquisition so Canada has enough operational airframes to contribute to NORAD/continental/arctic defence needs to offset the shockingly poor readiness rates of the F35. Remember 88 f35s gets us about 36 operational mission ready jets(if we’re lucky) which also happens to be the exact number of mission-ready jets required by Canada under our NORAD commitments. Or just stick with the f35, get the Mirabel maintenance depot up and running(unless Trump blocks it) and pound away at those readiness rates, and then go all in on GCAP. I say take the Swedish offer and I’m betting the utility of those crafty little jets will prove their worth over many years. We can than begin work with Sweden developing CCA’s to expand the capabilities of our Gripen fleet and use that experience to allow Canadian manufacturers to contribute to GCAP as a higher tier partner and focus our efforts on becoming leaders/experts in the emerging system of systems space. Pins and needles in the meantime.

JBoots's avatar

Saab produces all sorts of things, I wouldn’t read anything I to this at all vis a vis Gripen.

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?