Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kevin's avatar
Jul 7Edited

Let's hope they grow their workforce.. No offense to the workers at Seaspan but with a fleet of 4 they should have been capable of having one in the water in operations every single day with one on the ready for launch if needed. This certainly was not the case the last three decades. Canada has gone years on several occasions with no submarines in the water at all, let alone having one on the ready to launch along side it. I understand the parts issues on an orphan fleet, however you'd think after the first decade the management of manufacturing or sourcing of spares would have been a priority. Just saying, stating you're the only experienced maintainer of a sub fleet that has proven to be a case of how not to run submarine maintenance isn't exactly a plus IMO.

No posts

Ready for more?