Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brad B's avatar

I'm getting flashbacks to the C-series debacle, which made me very angry when it happened. That said, nothing available has the capabilities of the F-35. But also nothing seems to have as high-maintenance times either. Cut the number of F-35s to the 65 the Conservatives originally wanted, and get 60-80 Gripens to make up the numbers and also give a maintainable option.

Harry Neutel's avatar

I've always had a soft spot for the swedish option, so I'm probably biased, but it really does feel like they are backing us into a corner where the only way to keep our self respect is to go with the swedes. Like, there is no doubt that the f35 is more capable, but it has enough drawbacks to make the gripen competitive, if not the automatic winner of the competition. While trump and hoekstra obviously think they are adding reasons to not buy gripens, they are completely oblivious to how they are making the f35 less attractive at the same time. It's the world's most excruciating slow motion train wreck, only it's not that slow motion...

12 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?